Skip to main content

Sulphur 398 Jan-Feb 2022

A co-product again


Editorial

A co-product again

“There are signs that this particular sulphur price spike may be fairly short-lived”

It’s a slightly dispiriting fact about the sulphur industry that most of its producers don’t really want it. If you’re a refiner or a sour gas producer, you mainly care about the diesel and gasoline or natural gas that you can process and sell, and the sulphur is just the inconvenient component that the law and your customers force you to remove. But at times when sulphur prices, as they have at the start of this January, reach levels as high as $300/t, then the industry standing joke is that sulphur suddenly stops being a by-product or waste product, and starts to become a ‘co-product’ instead.

The last time that sulphur prices reached this level was the 2008-09 price spike, a time when China’s rapid industrialisation and consequent overheated commodity markets, coupled with overheated financial markets that eventually led to the great crash, drove sulphur spot rates to briefly reach unheard-of levels of $800/t. As former ASRL head and long-time industry commentator Jim Hyne said to me at the time: “somebody out there is making a lot of money”, though it was often hard to get anyone to admit to who that might be. Even so, the current price spike is a remarkable turnaround considering that at the start of 2020, sulphur prices were down at $40/t f.o.b. Middle East.

This time of year is often a tighter time for sulphur markets, with availability from Central Asia constrained by weather. But on top of that, phosphate markets have been heading skywards as China cuts back on exports and the US imposes tariffs on product from Morocco and Russia. Russian fertilizer export quotas have merely exacerbated an already tight supply situation. Sulphuric acid markets are also tight, with European smelter acid production down due to maintenance turnarounds and nickel demand for battery production rising rapidly, boosting the need for sulphur-burnt acid.

There are signs that this particular sulphur price spike may be fairly short-lived; perhaps only a couple more months, and we needn’t start melting down the Canadian stockpiles just yet. More sulphur is starting to flow from completed refinery projects in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, and we should soon see, at long last, the impact of the much-delayed Barzan LNG project in Qatar. The gradual addition of 3 million t/a of sulphur capacity between the various projects should be enough to calm markets and bring prices back down by the end of the year. For now, though, the sulphur industry can enjoy another brief period of being a co-product again.

Latest in Outlook & Reviews

Running the gamut

This issue of Sulphur magazine contains a preview of CRU’s Sulphur + Sulphuric Acid conference in Woodlands, Texas, which is being held from November 3rd to 5th this year, giving delegates the opportunity to meet and discuss some of the trends which are continuing to change the sulphur and sulphuric acid industries. Some of this is echoed in our editorial coverage this issue; the rise of electric vehicles and the continuing electrification of society is changing demand for metals and impacting upon both sulphur and sulphuric acid markets alike. As CRU’s principal analyst Peter Harrison discusses on pages 36-37, battery demand for nickel is leading to a surge in new nickel leaching capacity in Indonesia which is drawing in greatly increased volumes of sulphur, while rising demand for copper is leading to additional volumes of smelter acid from China, India and Indonesia which are impacting the merchant market for acid, as detailed by CRU’s Viviana Alvorado on pages 38-40. In the United States, new lithium mines will require additional sulphur (see pages 22-23). Rare earths and battery metal recovery will form a major topic on the first day of the Sulphur + Sulphuric Acid conference, with speakers from Lithium Americas, one of the pioneers of the new US lithium industry.

Is the world ready for CBAM?

At the end of this year, the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will move from its transitional phase into its ‘definitive’ phase, whereby the carbon costs of goods entering the EU will need to be priced in. CBAM requires suppliers to calculate the carbon emissions of their fertilizer (and other, e.g. steel) products, including indirect emissions, for example from electricity consumed in the process, and emissions of precursor or raw materials. They will then need to purchase CBAM certificates to cover embedded emissions above the established free allowance benchmark rates determined by the European Commission: 1.57 tonnes CO2e/tonne ammonia and 0.23 tCO2e/t nitric acid.