Skip to main content

Sulphur 413 Jul-Aug 2024

31 July 2024

Market Outlook

Market Outlook

Historical price trends $/tonne
Source: BCInsight

SULPHUR

  • Sulphur prices are expected to recover from declines in May and June and continue climbing over the coming months, though good availability will limit upside.
  • Port inventories in China have declined to their lowest volume this year, but remain higher than the average for 2022-23. Recent firming in domestic phosphate markets should add some support. Affordability of sulphur relative to phosphates is good, especially with DAP and MAP prices climbing, though some downstream production is still relatively weak, limiting appetite for raw material sulphur.
  • Sulphur demand in Indonesia for nickel is set to increase further following a big jump in imports since 2022, limiting possible downside to global spot prices. Still, some of this demand may be met with increased domestic smelter acid output.
  • On the supply side, Kazakhstan’s Kashagan oilfield has faced government pressure to reduce its sulphur stocks, and crushed lump supply from the site adding to market length, though lower stock levels should ease this pressure later in the year and sales of additional volumes from stock are expected to slow.
  • Overall, the recent growth in sulphur production, in addition to producer stock drawdown and high China inventories, is expected to limit upwards potential for prices in the short term and keep sulphur prices low relative to phosphates. Still, good affordability continues to support raw materials purchasing and leaves room for further price increases, especially if downstream production picks up further and sulphur stock drawdown slows as expected.

SULPHURIC ACID

  • Sulphuric acid prices are expected to remain relatively firm before undergoing slight declines in Q4, but prices may be pushed down further if demand is weaker than expected.
  • Smelters in Japan and South Korea are facing reduced sales options this year. China, the key source of marginal seaborne acid supply, requires higher acid prices to draw out more volume, as domestic sales offer favourable pricing.
  • India’s import demand is under pressure as sulphur offers a more affordable raw material option. In addition, buyers have recently added sulphur burner capacity, limiting merchant acid requirements, with additional domestic smelter acid production expected during the forecast from Adani’s recently commissioned large smelter likely to cut acid import demand further.
  • Indonesia imports increased steeply in 2023, but import demand there is also likely to decline as domestic production increases from both integrated sulphur burners and new smelting capacity.
  • Improving availability of smelter acid and sulphur in the US Gulf has been limiting merchant acid import requirements. Sulphur availability in the region is increasing at the moment, and prices there still suggest much lower levels on acid, though strong fertilizer markets are supporting acid prices.

Latest in Outlook & Reviews

Protectionism casts a shadow over the new year

The start of a new year is a traditional time to take stock of the previous 12 months and look ahead to the next. In this regard, CRU’s most recent annual client survey, conducted at the end of December last year, makes interesting reading as to your own concerns for 2025 and beyond. There were numerous responses across commodity and financial sectors, and broadly based worldwide, if slightly skewed towards Europe and North America, but across all of these the key worry for the coming year clearly emerged as trade tariffs and protectionism. This is perhaps unsurprising, given incoming US president Donald Trump’s avowed intent to impose blanket 20% tariffs on all goods entering the US, and up to 60% on China. While most clients did not think tariffs would rise as much as some of Trump’s rhetoric might suggest, most expect rises of 5-10% across the board, and Asian businesses are most concerned. CRU’s most recent position paper on US tariffs highlights some of the internal political and legal challenges in implementing these, but does acknowledge that some rises will be inevitable, and may well produce the kind of reciprocal measures last seen in the previous Trump administration’s trade war with China and the EU in 2018.

Tariff uncertainties cloud the picture

Nitrogen+Syngas went to press just a few days before Donald Trump’s swearing-in as the next president of the United States. While it is sometimes difficult to sort the truth from the hyperbole in his public pronouncements, nevertheless, if taken at face value, they would seem to indicate that we may be in for a turbulent four years in commodity markets in particular. While he is an avowed military non-interventionist, on the economic policy side he has emerged as a firm believer in the power of tariffs to alter markets in the favour of the US, and has promised 20% tariffs on all goods entering the US, potentially rising to 25% for Canada and Mexico, and 60% for his particular bugbear, China, sparking a scramble for wholesalers to stock up in the last few weeks of the Biden presidency. Trump previously raised tariffs on Chinese goods entering the US to 20% during his first term, and the Biden administration made no attempt to reverse this, and even added some additional ones, for example 20% on Russian and Moroccan phosphate imports.