Skip to main content

Nitrogen+Syngas 368 Nov-Dec 2020

Incident No. 3: Backflow in pressurised leak detection system for loose liner of HP scrubber


UREAKNOWHOW.COM INCIDENT REPORT

Plant Manager+

This case study describes a backflow scenario in a pressurised leak detection system. Backflow can occur in case of a relatively large leak (crack in liner), where the flowmeter installed downstream of the equipment acts as a flow restriction, allowing pressure to build up.If the flowmeter is installed upstream of the equipment there is the risk of disconnected tubing going undetected.

Furthermore, in this case the process fluid did not contain urea and is less sensitive to clogging, even though it did. In cases where the process fluid contains urea the situation is even more critical.

From this incident it can be learned that a pressurised leak detection system requires tracing and insulation of all tubing in the leak detection circuits. However, this will only temporarily reduced the risk of clogging. In the opinion of the FIORDA team, an active vacuum leak detection system is a more reliable choice.

Carbamate in tubing of leak detection circuit due to backflow.
Fig. 1: Leak in pressurised leak detection system

Event description

In 2010, a 25-22-2 urea grade liner was installed on a 316L UG older overlay weld in the bottom of a HP scrubber dating from 1980. As the ammonia analyser was unavailable due to maintenance, the outlet vent of the pressurised leak detection system was checked for ammonia with a pocket ammonia analyser every four hours.

On one occasion, ammonia was detected and further investigation revealed that a lot of tubing had been clogged (see Fig. 1 and photo above). After opening the HP scrubber it was revealed that the liner showed cracks.

Immediate response action

The plant was stopped for further inspections. By analysing the tubing with more carbamate, it was concluded that backflow had occurred and contaminated the leak detection circuits of all three HP equipment items.

Causes

The leak rate was so large that the flowmeter acted as a flow restriction, pressure built up and backflow occurred leading to clogging of the leak detection circuits in all of the other high pressure equipment items.

Primary consequence

As a result of the timely shutdown the risk of a rupture was successfully avoided.

Secondary consequence

There was an unplanned shutdown, extensive work was required to clean and open all leak detection circuits and carry out a repair/relining job.

Risk level

The likelihood of a major consequence was moderate, but the risk level was high.

Prevention safeguards

Assure proper functioning of your leak detection system. Safe plant operation is only possible with a good working leak detection system, including an accurate and reliable ammonia analyser.

Mitigation safeguards

In case of a leak, confirm and locate the leak, shut down the plant and drain the synthesis section as soon as possible.

Corrective recommendation

The leak detection system was refurbished and made operational before start-up of the plant. All plant operators received renewed instructions. An inspection and maintenance program was also implemented to increase the reliability and availability of the existing leak detection system.

This case study report is one of many serious incident reports on UreaKnowHow.com’s Fertilizer Industry Operational Risks Database, FIORDA, which has been created for collecting and sharing process safety and reliability information among participating companies in the fertilizer industry.

Latest in Outlook & Reviews

Running the gamut

This issue of Sulphur magazine contains a preview of CRU’s Sulphur + Sulphuric Acid conference in Woodlands, Texas, which is being held from November 3rd to 5th this year, giving delegates the opportunity to meet and discuss some of the trends which are continuing to change the sulphur and sulphuric acid industries. Some of this is echoed in our editorial coverage this issue; the rise of electric vehicles and the continuing electrification of society is changing demand for metals and impacting upon both sulphur and sulphuric acid markets alike. As CRU’s principal analyst Peter Harrison discusses on pages 36-37, battery demand for nickel is leading to a surge in new nickel leaching capacity in Indonesia which is drawing in greatly increased volumes of sulphur, while rising demand for copper is leading to additional volumes of smelter acid from China, India and Indonesia which are impacting the merchant market for acid, as detailed by CRU’s Viviana Alvorado on pages 38-40. In the United States, new lithium mines will require additional sulphur (see pages 22-23). Rare earths and battery metal recovery will form a major topic on the first day of the Sulphur + Sulphuric Acid conference, with speakers from Lithium Americas, one of the pioneers of the new US lithium industry.

Is the world ready for CBAM?

At the end of this year, the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will move from its transitional phase into its ‘definitive’ phase, whereby the carbon costs of goods entering the EU will need to be priced in. CBAM requires suppliers to calculate the carbon emissions of their fertilizer (and other, e.g. steel) products, including indirect emissions, for example from electricity consumed in the process, and emissions of precursor or raw materials. They will then need to purchase CBAM certificates to cover embedded emissions above the established free allowance benchmark rates determined by the European Commission: 1.57 tonnes CO2e/tonne ammonia and 0.23 tCO2e/t nitric acid.