Skip to main content

Sulphur 392 Jan-Feb 2021

China’s phosphate industry


PHOSPHATES

China’s phosphate industry

Continuing rationalisation in China’s phosphate industry has been reducing demand for sulphur and sulphuric acid at the same time that the country is producing more of both.

Diammonium phosphate is the largest component of Chinese phosphate production.
PHOTO: 123RF

China’s phosphate industry has come to be one of the defining features of the global sulphur industry. The rapid expansion in Chinese phosphate capacity in the period 2000-2015, especially of mono- and di-ammonium phosphate capacity (MAP/DAP) initially began as in import replacement policy, but capacity building continued long after self-sufficiency was reached, and turned China from a net importer into a net exporter of phosphates, with India an increasingly important customer.

China has large reserves of phosphates – the second largest in the world – and was able to produce ammonia by coal gasification to draw upon large domestic reserves of coal. However, generating enough sulphuric acid to process the large volumes of phosphate rock was more than China’s metallurgical and pyrite-roasting acid capacity was able to supply. With domestic sulphur production relatively low, the net result was rising imports of sulphur to China to feed sulphur burning acid capacity.

Chinese phosphoric acid production rose from 10.9 million t/a P2 O5 in 2008 to 18.8 million t/a P2 O5 in 2015. This was mostly due to a doubling of MAP and DAP production over that period, from 3.7 to 7.2 million t/a P2 O5 in the case of MAP, and from 3.8 million t/a to 8.1 million t/a P2 O5 in the case of DAP, as shown in Figure 1.However, since then there has been a slow but steady decline, especially in DAP production.

The major reasons for this are twofold; the government has tried to make Chinese use of phosphate more efficient, and to cap fertilizer consumption at its 2020 level. Chinese DAP consumption peaked in 2013 at 5.6 million t/a P2 O5 , but since then has fallen to 3.7 in 2019. MAP consumption reached 6.2 million t/a P2 O5 in 2016, but fell to 5.7 million t/a in 2019. Falling domestic consumption means that producers are more reliant on finding export markets for their product, and increasing supply and competition has been making that more difficult. Apart from a rally during 2018, DAP prices have been on a slide since 2014, dropping from $500/t to around $270/t f.o.b. the US Gulf in late 2019, some way below the average Chinese cost of production, which is just over $300/t.

Side by side with this has been a crackdown by the Chinese government on polluting industries and increasing environmental legislation. Much of the excess or unproductive capacity has been forced to close over the past few years, especially in the Yangtze River basin, where much of China’s phosphate capacity is concentrated. In 2015-17, about 1.8 million t/a of DAP capacity and 2.5 million t/a of MAP capacity (both in terms of tonnes product) was idled, most of it from smaller scale producers.

Chinese phosphate rock mining has also been falling as costs of production rise, and the country may become a net phosphate rock importer by 2023.

Fig. 1: Chinese phosphate production (million tonnes P2 O5 )

After the pandemic

The coronavirus pandemic was another challenge for the Chinese phosphate industry. Hubei province, where the outbreak began and was at its worst, is the centre of the Chinese phosphate industry, with 28% of the country’s production capacity. Closures dropped the fertilizer industry utilisation rate by 30-40% during 2Q 2020. Chinese DAP production was down by 12% in 1H 2020 compared to 2019, and MAP production was down 7%. Chinese DAP exports dropped 26% over the same period. However, the closures did remove a lot of the overcapacity in the international phosphate market, and led to prices heading back upwards from the middle of the year.

Domestic demand also held up well. Argus reckoned that China’s total processed phosphate consumption fell by 2.5% in 2020 compared to 2019, to a total of 15.5 million t/a P2 O5 for the full year. However, China’s ministry of agriculture has mandated an increase in grain planting areas this year, including requiring rice farmers to plant two seasons of the crop, to ensure sufficient food supply, and this is likely to boost Chinese phosphate demand, as will higher corn prices and low domestic DAP stocks.

Cheaper sulphur and sulphuric acid prices during 2020 helped lower the costs of production for Chinese DAP producers, although these began to rise again towards the end of the year, mitigated slightly by China’s recent announcement as from December 2020 that it will not charge import duties and value added tax on imports of sulphur.

Another boost for Chinese producers has been record Indian demand for fertilizer. Chinese exports of DAP were at 800,000 tonnes (product) in August 2020, 60% up on the previous year.

Looking forward

Chinese fertilizer consumption continues to be on a long term declining trend as farmers move to more efficient use of nutrient. The current Chinese MAP/DAP capacity rationalisation is drawing to a close, and there is more new capacity on the horizon. However, this will find some new regulations, such as restrictions on phosphogypsum storage, to be an additional burden, and may cap new production. Even in spite of this, however, there is a major overhang of idled capacity or capacity running at low rates which could be ramped back up depending upon the price environment. Chinese phosphate production, and hence sulphur demand, this depends very much upon international demand for processed phosphates. With more low cost DAP coming from Morocco and Saudi Arabia, Chinese producers may find themselves squeezed out of key markets. The general indication seems to be that the boom period for Chinese DAP production is over, and a slow period of decline is most likely for the medium term, aside from during temporary periods of market shortage.

Latest in Asia

Start-up of world’s largest methanol plant

Johnson Matthey (JM) says that the three methanol production trains of Inner Mongolia Baofeng Coal-based New Materials Co., Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ningxia Baofeng Energy Group, were successfully commissioned in November 2024, February 2025, and March 2025, respectively. Located in the Wushenqi Sulige Economic Development Zone of Ordos City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, this plant employs Johnson Matthey’s advanced methanol synthesis technology and catalysts, making it the largest single methanol plant in the world. Inner Mongolia Baofeng also stands as one of the largest chemical enterprises globally that produces polyethylene and polypropylene by using coal as a substitute for oil.

Jilin Electric Power commissions green ammonia plant

Jilin Electric Power says that it has commissioned one of the world’s largest green hydrogen and ammonia plants in Jilin Province. Jilin says that this is the world’s largest operating green ammonia plant, with a capacity of up to 32,000 t/a of green hydrogen and 180,000 t/a of green ammonia; the largest combined PEM and alkaline electrolyser system, combining 196 MW of alkaline electrolysis and 52 MW of PEM electrolysis, respectively; and the world’s largest block of solid-state hydrogen storage - 48,000 Nm3. The plant is fed by 800 MW of installed renewable power. The green ammonia is EU-certified under low-carbon fuel standards, and offtake agreements are in place with companies located in Europe, Japan and South Korea.

Partnership for sustainable energy solutions

Clariant has signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Shanghai Boiler Works, a full subsidiary of Shanghai Electric specialising in energy conversion and the development of new energy applications, to jointly foster innovation in sustainable energy solutions. The partners will combine their expertise to advance green energy projects in China. The agreement is the result of close and successful cooperation in Shanghai Electric’s new biomass-to-green methanol plant in Taonan, Jilin Province, China. In addition to supplying its MegaMax catalysts, Clariant provided technical on-site support during the successful startup of the 50,000 t/a plant. The second phase of the project, with a capacity of 200,000 t/a green methanol and 10,000 t/a of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), is expected to start production in 2027. The ceremony for the official signing of the partnership contract took place last week at the Clariant Innovation Center in Frankfurt, Germany.

Biomethanol plant for Kandla

The Deendayal Port Authority (DPA), Kandla, has issued a tender for the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract to build India’s first port-based bio-methanol plant. The 3,500 t/a plant will use oxy-steam gasification technology to convert biomass into bio-methanol. The scope covers design, engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and product certification, with bidders required to outline plant life, warranties, capital expenditure, and operating costs. The move follows DPA’s earlier call in May for turnkey proposals for a larger integrated plant of over 15,000 t/a, and its February 2025 agreement with Bapu’s Shipping Jamnagar Pvt. Ltd. to develop India’s first bio-methanol bunkering facility, including a dedicated bunker barge, at Kandla Port.

Study on ammonia fuel storage tanks and transportation equipment

Shipping classification society ClassNK has formed a consortium with IHI Corporation, JFE Steel, Tohoku University, and Institute of Science Tokyo to participate in Japan’s Feasibility Study Program on Energy and New Environmental Technology. The consortium will promote the development of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) probability evaluation tools for fuel ammonia storage tanks and transportation equipment. Initially, the consortium will conduct a detailed study of the SCC mechanism involved in steel cracking due to the combined effects of mechanical stress and corrosion caused by liquid ammonia. Thereafter, the consortium plans to develop tools for easily and accurately assessing SCC probability. Finally, opinions will be solicited from stakeholders to formulate risk-based maintenance procedures for fuel ammonia storage and transportation facilities, and marine fuel tanks ultimately to promote the expanded use of fuel ammonia.